Menu
BONUS!!! Download part of ExamTorrent MLS-C01 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jYKtRRxJgghA8Z7zKnd5s1n6MAOjMfYL
By practicing under the real exam scenario of this Amazon MLS-C01 web-based practice test, you can cope with exam anxiety and appear in the final test with maximum confidence. You can change the time limit and number of questions of this Amazon MLS-C01 web-based practice test. This customization feature of our AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty (MLS-C01) web-based practice exam aids in practicing as per your requirements. You can assess and improve your knowledge with our Amazon MLS-C01 practice exam.
Amazon MLS-C01 Exam covers a wide range of topics related to machine learning, including data preparation, feature engineering, model selection, model training, and model deployment. It also assesses the candidate's understanding of AWS services such as Amazon SageMaker, Amazon Rekognition, Amazon Comprehend, and Amazon Translate, which are commonly used for machine learning applications.
Amazon MLS-C01 (AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty) certification exam is designed for individuals who want to validate their expertise in machine learning on the Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform. AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty certification exam is intended for individuals who have experience in designing, developing, and deploying machine learning models on AWS. By earning this certification, individuals can demonstrate their knowledge and skills in various aspects of machine learning, such as data preparation, feature engineering, model training, and deployment.
>> MLS-C01 Visual Cert Test <<
The pass rate is 98.75% for MLS-C01 study materials, and if you choose us, we can ensure you pass the exam successfully. In addition, MLS-C01 exam dumps of us are edited by professional experts, they are quite familiar with the exam center, therefore MLS-C01 study materials cover most of knowledge points. We also pass guarantee and money back guarantee if you fail to pass the exam. We will refund your money to your payment account. Online service stuff for MLS-C01 Exam Braindumps is available, and if you have any questions, you can have a chat with us.
| Duration | 180 minutes |
| Schedule Exam | PEARSON VUE |
| Passing Score | 750 / 1000 |
| Sample Questions | AWS MLS-C01 Sample Questions |
NEW QUESTION # 313
A company that runs an online library is implementing a chatbot using Amazon Lex to provide book recommendations based on category. This intent is fulfilled by an AWS Lambda function that queries an Amazon DynamoDB table for a list of book titles, given a particular category. For testing, there are only three categories implemented as the custom slot types: "comedy," "adventure," and "documentary." A machine learning (ML) specialist notices that sometimes the request cannot be fulfilled because Amazon Lex cannot understand the category spoken by users with utterances such as "funny," "fun," and "humor." The ML specialist needs to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB.
How should the ML specialist fix the problem?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The best way to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB is to add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type. This way, Amazon Lex can resolve the synonyms to the corresponding slot values and pass them to the Lambda function. For example, if the slot type has a value "comedy" with synonyms "funny", "fun", and "humor", then any of these words entered by the user will be resolved to "comedy" and the Lambda function can query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in that category. Adding synonyms to the custom slot type can be done easily using the Amazon Lex console or API, and does not require any code changes.
The other options are not correct because:
Option A: Adding the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type would not fix the problem, because the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table are not aware of these new values. The Lambda function would not be able to query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in the new categories, and the request would still fail. Moreover, adding new values to the slot type would increase the complexity and maintenance of the chatbot, as the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would have to be updated accordingly.
Option B: Creating a new custom slot type, adding the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and using this slot type for the slot would also not fix the problem, for the same reasons as option A. The Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would not be able to handle the new slot type and its values, and the request would still fail. Furthermore, creating a new slot type would require more effort and time than adding synonyms to the existing slot type.
Option C: Using the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database is not a suitable approach for this use case. The AMAZON.SearchQuery slot type is used to capture free-form user input that corresponds to a search query. However, this slot type does not perform any validation or resolution of the user input, and passes the raw input to the Lambda function. This means that the Lambda function would have to handle the logic of parsing and matching the user input to the DynamoDB table, which would require changing the Lambda code and adding more complexity to the solution.
References:
Custom slot type - Amazon Lex
Using Synonyms - Amazon Lex
Built-in Slot Types - Amazon Lex
NEW QUESTION # 314
A monitoring service generates 1 TB of scale metrics record data every minute. A Research team performs queries on this data using Amazon Athena. The queries run slowly due to the large volume of data, and the team requires better performance.
How should the records be stored in Amazon S3 to improve query performance?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 315
The chief editor for a product catalog wants the research and development team to build a machine learning system that can be used to detect whether or not individuals in a collection of images are wearing the company's retail brand. The team has a set of training data.
Which machine learning algorithm should the researchers use that BEST meets their requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The problem of detecting whether or not individuals in a collection of images are wearing the company's retail brand is an example of image recognition, which is a type of machine learning task that identifies and classifies objects in an image. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a type of machine learning algorithm that are well-suited for image recognition, as they can learn to extract features from images and handle variations in size, shape, color, and orientation of the objects. CNNs consist of multiple layers that perform convolution, pooling, and activation operations on the input images, resulting in a high-level representation that can be used for classification or detection. Therefore, option D is the best choice for the machine learning algorithm that meets the requirements of the chief editor.
Option A is incorrect because latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) is a type of machine learning algorithm that is used for topic modeling, which is a task that discovers the hidden themes or topics in a collection of text documents. LDA is not suitable for image recognition, as it does not preserve the spatial information of the pixels. Option B is incorrect because recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a type of machine learning algorithm that are used for sequential data, such as text, speech, or time series. RNNs can learn from the temporal dependencies and patterns in the input data, and generate outputs that depend on the previous states. RNNs are not suitable for image recognition, as they do not capture the spatial dependencies and patterns in the input images. Option C is incorrect because k-means is a type of machine learning algorithm that is used for clustering, which is a task that groups similar data points together based on their features. K-means is not suitable for image recognition, as it does not perform classification or detection of the objects in the images.
References:
Image Recognition Software - ML Image & Video Analysis - Amazon ...
Image classification and object detection using Amazon Rekognition ...
AWS Amazon Rekognition - Deep Learning Face and Image Recognition ...
GitHub - awslabs/aws-ai-solution-kit: Machine Learning APIs for common ...
Meet iNaturalist, an AWS-powered nature app that helps you identify ...
NEW QUESTION # 316
A Machine Learning Specialist is working for a credit card processing company and receives an unbalanced dataset containing credit card transactions. It contains 99,000 valid transactions and 1,000 fraudulent transactions The Specialist is asked to score a model that was run against the dataset The Specialist has been advised that identifying valid transactions is equally as important as identifying fraudulent transactions What metric is BEST suited to score the model?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) is a metric that is best suited to score the model for the given scenario.
AUC is a measure of the performance of a binary classifier, such as a model that predicts whether a credit card transaction is valid or fraudulent. AUC is calculated based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which is a plot that shows the trade-off between the true positive rate (TPR) and the false positive rate (FPR) of the classifier as the decision threshold is varied. The TPR, also known as recall or sensitivity, is the proportion of actual positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are correctly predicted as positive by the classifier. The FPR, also known as the fall-out, is the proportion of actual negative cases (valid transactions) that are incorrectly predicted as positive by the classifier. The ROC curve illustrates how well the classifier can distinguish between the two classes, regardless of the class distribution or the error costs. A perfect classifier would have a TPR of 1 and an FPR of 0 for all thresholds, resulting in a ROC curve that goes from the bottom left to the top left and then to the top right of the plot. A random classifier would have a TPR and an FPR that are equal for all thresholds, resulting in a ROC curve that goes from the bottom left to the top right of the plot along the diagonal line. AUC is the area under the ROC curve, and it ranges from 0 to
1. A higher AUC indicates a better classifier, as it means that the classifier has a higher TPR and a lower FPR for all thresholds. AUC is a useful metric for imbalanced classification problems, such as the credit card transaction dataset, because it is insensitive to the class imbalance and the error costs. AUC can capture the overall performance of the classifier across all possible scenarios, and it can be used to compare different classifiers based on their ROC curves.
The other options are not as suitable as AUC for the given scenario for the following reasons:
* Precision: Precision is the proportion of predicted positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are actually positive. Precision is a useful metric when the cost of a false positive is high, such as in spam detection or medical diagnosis. However, precision is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it can be misleadingly high when the positive class is rare. For example, a classifier that predicts all transactions as valid would have a precision of 0, but a very high accuracy of 99%.
Precision is also dependent on the decision threshold and the error costs, which may vary for different scenarios.
* Recall: Recall is the same as the TPR, and it is the proportion of actual positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are correctly predicted as positive by the classifier. Recall is a useful metric when the cost of a false negative is high, such as in fraud detection or cancer diagnosis. However, recall is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it can be misleadingly low when the positive class is rare. For example, a classifier that predicts all transactions as fraudulent would have a recall of 1, but a very low accuracy of 1%. Recall is also dependent on the decision threshold and the error costs, which may vary for different scenarios.
* Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): RMSE is a metric that measures the average difference between the predicted and the actual values. RMSE is a useful metric for regression problems, where the goal is to predict a continuous value, such as the price of a house or the temperature of a city. However, RMSE is not a good metric for classification problems, where the goal is to predict a discrete value, such as the class label of a transaction. RMSE is not meaningful for classification problems, because it does not capture the accuracy or the error costs of the predictions.
ROC Curve and AUC
How and When to Use ROC Curves and Precision-Recall Curves for Classification in Python Precision-Recall Root Mean Squared Error
NEW QUESTION # 317
A company wants to classify user behavior as either fraudulent or normal. Based on internal research, a machine learning specialist will build a binary classifier based on two features: age of account, denoted by x, and transaction month, denoted by y. The class distributions are illustrated in the provided figure. The positive class is portrayed in red, while the negative class is portrayed in black.
Which model would have the HIGHEST accuracy?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 318
......
Reliable MLS-C01 Test Voucher: https://www.examtorrent.com/MLS-C01-valid-vce-dumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of ExamTorrent MLS-C01 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jYKtRRxJgghA8Z7zKnd5s1n6MAOjMfYL
© All Rights Reserved.